The Real and the Unreal
One morning I was welcomed to the following heart warming e-mail:
“What’s all this BS in your writings?”
“BS!” Why would someone accuse me of that? And why state it in such an insulting
manner?
Of course our e-mail box offers us many surprises. One of the appeals of
e-mail – at least at this early stage of its novelty – is its spontaneity.
We are ready to endure the deluge of spam, which constitutes 80% of all e-mail,
for the several e-mails that will inform, entertain and above all, surprise
us.
Yet, this BS surprise would top them all. Read on.
I receive much e-mail, some complimentary, some critical. But even critique
has its etiquette. Why would someone who doesn’t even know me be so blunt
as to categorize my writings as “BS”?!
I am not suggesting that I don’t deserve such a “compliment” once in a while
to put me in my place. And frankly, it doesn’t take much thick skin to ignore
a few nasty words.
But as much as a tried I could not disregard the insult. No, this was not
about my ego being bruised. The sheer brevity of the words “what’s all this
BS in your writings?” conjured up all my feelings about the search for truth.
After all, I said to myself, the masters teach us that when you are accused
of something, even if it’s ostensibly unjustified, there must be a lesson
in it for you. Though the criticizer or accuser is accountable for his choice,
it behooves you (the accusee – is there such a word?) to soul search for some
semblance of truth in the critique.
So, I began thinking about my own hypocrisies and inconsistencies. Do I actually
live up to all that I write? How sincere are the thoughts I share in my writings
and classes? Isn’t it easier to advise others than to implement the same advice
in your own life? How real am I, and how much is performance?
The questions go on.
As do the justifications.
BS indeed.
Then again, who among us humans is immune to these distortions?
As one thought leads to the next, the words of the mystics loom ever larger:
“We live,” they tell us, “in a false world.” “Alma d’shikra,” a deceptive
world. Ever since the Divine concealed its presence in what is called in Kabbala
as the Lurianic doctrine of tzimtzum, our perception of reality is but a myopic
view, which struggles to see the “hand inside the glove.” Often we can even
deceive ourselves into thinking that there is no other “hand” that the one
we grasp.
So this “BS” e-mail has provoked a soul-search in my own being.
Or has it?
Comics say that two people never repent: Writers and speakers. Why? Because
though most of us have our failings, inspiring words we read or hear often
motivate us to improve ourselves. No hope however for a writer or a speaker.
When either of them hears an inspiring thought, instead of taking it personally
to heart, the writer or speaker says: “great material for my next speech or
article…”
And what about someone who is both a so-called writer and lecturer?
I share all this with a friend. I forgot that he was such a cynic. He simply
dismisses everything: “And you think that soul searching is honest? It’s all
part of the same BS. People need to feel that they are redeeming themselves
from the falsity of life, so they create another illusion called salvation.
That helps keep them sane. But it’s all part of the same false program, all
part of the same “matrix.”
“All of life,” he goes on, “is manipulation. The only difference is that
some manipulation is apparent; the rest is camouflaged in the cloak of sincerity.
The best manipulators are the ones that cover all their tracks,” he smirks.
“Might as well be speaking to Voltaire,” I think to myself, “who cynically
stated that if G-d didn’t exist we would need to create one.”
I for one cannot accept this cynical approach, which renders all of life
meaningless, which would of course, undermine the very basis of our organization.
Is this another form of BS? Everyone is promoting their own BS. For some
it takes the shape of honesty. Man, that really sounds like a lot of BS. Even
BS is a bunch of BS.
Ok, so where does that leave us?
If you’re confused, don’t worry, that’s part of the story.
If you really allow yourself to dwell on the topic and wander into the myriad
of possibilities, true and false can become a real quandary. Who defines the
criteria? And above all, is their any logical refutation to the million dollar
question: Maybe all of this is just part of one big illusion? Even the refutation
itself is part of the illusion.
All this provoked by a few, for all I know, harmlessly intended words via
e-mail.
Finally, I decided to swallow my pride and write back to the “BS” accuser.
I wrote my words carefully:
“Dear… I received your e-mail stating “What’s all this BS in your writings?”
You are of course entitled to your opinion, but I hope you don’t mind me asking
you what exactly provoked you to write these words? Sincerely [signed].
His response shocked me:
“Dear Rabbi. I am appalled that you think that I would insult you. On the
contrary I greatly respect you and your work. I have learned much from your
teachings, and I look forward to your weekly e-mails.
“I happened to notice the letters “bsd” appearing in some of your publications,
and I couldn’t help but wonder what is all this “bsd” in your writings?”
BS or BSD?
I couldn’t stop laughing.
Here I am undergoing an elaborate self-appraisal about honesty and truth,
waxing eloquent about the philosophies of life, when it all comes down to
a good ol’ typo: Instead of “BS” this fellow meant to write “BSD.” He was
wondering why there were “BSD” references in our writings and publications.
I wrote back to him explaining the significance of “BSD.” BSD is an acronym
for “B’Syayta D’shemaya,” which in Aramaic means “with the help of Heaven.”
An long-time Jewish custom is to write “BS”D” or “BH” (Boruch Hashem, blessed
is G-d), at the beginning of a letter, at the top of a page or the opening
of written work.
BSD is a way of reminding us that our works, our writings, our very beings,
are all a Divine gift. It’s a way of humbly acknowledging and that our creativity
is possible only with help from a greater place. This is turn helps us actually
become a channel on Earth for Heavenly expression.
It’s funny how things work. Of all terms “BS” is the one that ends up reminding
me of “BSD.”
If you look closely enough, the “BS” of this world reminds us of “BSD.”
Or shall I say: the “BSD” helps remind us of the “BS.”
There are two ways to reach truth: Interpolation or extrapolation. One is
through rigorous inquiry in search of reality, looking for glimpses and signs
of deeper truths. The other is through the process of elimination: By recognizing
the falseness of life and the frailty of existence, by dissecting and deconstructing
reality as we perceive it and challenging our very perception or perception
itself, we come to discover, by contrast, an alternative, higher reality.
The Rebbe of Kotzk once interpreted, in his characteristic sharp way, the
famous Midrashic analogy about Abraham’s search for truth. A man was wandering
in an untamed forest when he came upon a brightly lit palace. The man exclaimed:
“There must be an owner of this palace.” So too Abraham, wandered about the
wilderness of a pagan world, and upon seeing the infinite order of the universe,
recognized that it must have an architect. Every book has an author.
Says the Kotzker: “Birah dolekes” (a brightly lit palace) can also be interpreted
as meaning “a burning palace.” When Abraham saw how the world was “burning”
in distortion and corruption, he realized: There must be an owner…
BS and BSD – two choices we have before us at all times.
As we read in this week’s Torah chapter about the construction of the Temple,
it’s a good time to reflect on its personal meaning:
We were charged to build in our false, material world – a home for the Divine,
“Build me a Sanctuary, and I will dwell among you.”
We are not doomed to the trappings of our manipulative world. We have the
power to introduce truth. But to do so we need to embrace “BSD” and concretize
it in our daily lives.
BS or BSD – which one will it be today?