|
Inflation
What are the differences between the First Passover and
the Second Passover? On the First Passover, [leaven] is forbidden
to be seen or to be found [in ones possession]; on the
Second Passover, leaven and matzah coexist in ones home...
Talmud, Pesachim 95a
A mitzvah is a commandmentG-d instructing man what He desires for man
to do or not do. Understandably, then, virtually all of the Torahs 613
mitzvot are unilateral declarations of divine will: one does not see many proposals
for mitzvot being presented to G-d, or negotiations between the
supreme legislator and His earthly constituents.
One of the rare exceptions[1] to this norm is the mitzvah of Pesach Sheini,
the Second Passover. The First Passover, as we all know, commences
on the evening following the 14th of Nissan, the night that the Jewish people
were liberated from Egypt. The Second Passover comes one month later, on the
14th of Iyar, and was instituted as a result of a petition by several individuals
who were unable to participate in the First Passover.
At the heart of Passover is the korban pesach (the paschal lamb),
which was offered in the Holy Temple on the afternoon of the 14th of Nissanindeed,
all other observances of the festival (the eating of matzah and maror,
the prohibition against leaven), as well as the festivals very name, are
related to the Passover offering. The laws of korban pesach mandate
that only those who are in a state of taharah (ritual purity) may offer
and partake of it. One year after the Exodus, as the Jewish people were preparing
to celebrate their first Passover outside Egypt, a group of Jews approached
Moses. They explained that they were ritually impure because they had come in
contact with a corpse; the law would therefore preclude their bringing a korban
pesach. But they refused to reconcile themselves to this. Why should
we be deprived?! they cried; why should we be excluded from observing
the festival of redemption, as will the entire community of Israel? G-d responded
by instituting a second Passover especially for those who, for whatever reason,
were prevented from offering the korban pesach in its appointed
time.[2]
An Exception and Its Exception
Those who offer the korban pesach on the 14th of Iyar follow
the same basic procedure as those who brought it one month earlier, on the First
Passover. There are, however, several legal and procedural distinctions between
the two Passovers, the most important of which concerns the prohibition against
leaven. On the First Passover, leaven is strictly forbidden from noon of the
14th of Nissan (the earliest time at which the korban pesach can
be brought) until the conclusion of the festival; throughout this period, no
leaven may be eaten, used in any way, or even be present in ones domain.
On the Second Passover, however, this prohibition does not apply. While the
korban pesach is to be eaten with matzah, the unleavened bread,
there is no mandated exclusion of leaven; in the words of the Talmud, leaven
and matzah coexist in ones home.
Leaven is dough that has risenflour and water that have come
in contact and have been allowed to ferment, with the effect that the mixture
has bloated and exaggerated its mass. Leaven is thus the symbol of egotism and
pridea leavened soul is one in whom the ferment of self-importance
has caused him to lose sight of his true place in G-ds world, with the
result that he recognizes only his bloated self and its inflated wants.
This explains why the prohibition against leaven on Passover is so severe and
uncompromising: in no other instance does the Torah not only forbid the consumption
of, or derivation of benefit from, even the smallest quantity of a substance,
but also its very existence in our possession. But egotism and pride is not
just another undesirable traitit is the source of all evil in the heart
of man. Every sin and vice originates in an assertion of egowith the sense
that the self is supreme and that its needs and desires take precedence to all
else. Thus, in his Laws of Human Character,[3] Maimonides advises that in all traits a person
should pursue the Golden Mean,[4]
with a single exception: pride. Pride must be vanquished utterly.
This is not to say that there is nothing positive in the stimulation of ego.
Indeed, no phenomenon in G-ds world is intrinsically negative, for all
derives from Him, and He is the essence of good.[5] But while we have been empowered
to exploit many ostensibly negative traits toward a productive and
G-dly end, there also exist forces that are so potent, and whose potential for
corruption is so devastating, that we must renounce them as beyond our capacity
to deal with. One such element is pride: we must reject it unequivocally, as
any attempt to make positive use of it is bound to fail and be counterproductive.
There are times, however, when the positive core of a most negative phenomenon
rises to the surface, when its G-dly essence asserts itself over all iniquitous
expressions and corrupting possibilities. Such was the case with the group of
individuals who approached Moses in the desert: their me instinct
asserted itself not in the form of a desire for dominance or corporeal gratification,
but in a soul-searing desire to serve their Creator. The cry Why should
we be deprived?! expressed not a need to have and be, but a yen to give
and serve, to recognize and submit to the divine grantor of their freedom. In
their petition, the ferment and leavening of their selves was not
the antithesis of humble and self-effacing matzah, but rather its complement.
Leaven and matzah coexisted in their souls, ego giving rise to commitment, self-realization
giving rise to an affirmation of mans indebtedness to
G-d.
On the Second Passover, the festival that came into being out of
their selfish cry, there is no need to banish leaven from our homes.
For when the self thus asserts itself, it is a welcome participant in our celebration
of the freedom we achieved at the Exodusthe freedom to be G-ds people.
Based on the Rebbe’s talks on various occasions [6]
Adapted from the teachings of the Rebbe by Yanki Tauber
___________________________
[1]. Another instance of a mitzvah prompted by human
initiative is the laws of inheritance legislated in response to a petition
by the daughters of Tzelafchad, as related in Numbers 27. See also Jethros
proposal for a judicial hierarchy in Exodus 18.
[3]. Mishneh Torah, Laws of Human Character,
2:3. Cf. Ethics of the Fathers, 4:4.
[4]. I.e., he should be neither miserly nor a spendthrift,
but generous; neither cowardly nor reckless, but brave; neither contrary nor
timid, but easygoing; etc.
[5]. Cf. Lamentations 3:38.
[6]. Likkutei Sichot, vol. XVIII, p. 121; Rebbes
Haggadah (1991), pp. 880-881; et al.
|