Tag: communication

  • The Stutterer

    The Stutterer

    Sensitivity, Leadership and the Secret of Communication

    He spoke slowly and deliberately. Every word seemed carefully measured, as if he was being charged by the syllable. Nothing more than necessary was said and nothing less. Rarely did I hear a speaker so focused and precise.

    Even more impressive was his refinement and humility. He spoke about the challenges each of us face – some of us are coming off personal loss, others hurting from psychological scars and yet others challenged by physical handicaps. The familiarity and empathy with which he expressed the inner loneliness associated with these wounds showed that he had suffered much in his life.

    “Be patient with yourself,” he said, “don’t rush things and don’t get caught up with the whizzing forces around you. Let yourself be – and always know that you have a beautiful soul inside of you, despite the outer scars you may carry. When your skin gets burned it hurts, but it doesn’t make you feel inadequate or unworthy. The same is with our emotional pains and insecurities. They are what they are, and do not reflect your inherent value.”

    As he concluded his moving talk, suddenly and quite deliberately, he quickened the pace of his words. “Now let me share with you my… li-li-li-li-li-little s-s-s-secret,” he stammered, barely able to finish the sentence. “From the time I was a li-li-li-ttle child, I s-s-s-stuttered. But,” and he slowed down again, “with hard work and patience I have learned to control my inclination. You can too.”

    He slowly walked away from the podium. The entire audience sat stunned.

    I felt so sad. I remembered a classmate who stuttered. It would always break my heart to witness his stammering voice, the facial contortions, struggling to express himself. But then I remembered that this man just spoke for 40 minutes expressing from the depths of his heart a most powerful and needed message. “What a display of courage?” I thought to myself. “What strength of character to be so vulnerable in front of a crowd!”

    *  *  *

    Who was the first documented stutterer in history?

    This week’s Torah portion tells us. Moses is chosen by G-d to redeem the Jewish people from their oppression under Pharaoh and the Egyptians. In his classical dialogue with G-d, one that teaches us volumes, Moses resists becoming G-d’s messenger.

    Three times and with three different expressions Moses declares that he cannot speak: “I am not a man of words – not yesterday, not the day before, not from the very first time You spoke to me. My speech is difficult and my tongue is difficult” (Exodus 4:10). “The children of Israel did not listen to me. How then will Pharaoh listen to me, seeing that I am of closed lips?” (6:12;30).

    Moses was the communicator par-excellence; the one chosen to transmit the Torah to his generations and generations to come. Why, of all people, did G-d make it so that the ultimate communicator was “not a man of words,” a man whose speech and tongue were “difficult”?!

    Explains the Zohar (II 25b), that in the Egyptian exile Moses’ “speech was in exile.” Moses, who in his selflessness was a seamless channel for the Divine, a totally integrated spirit and body, could not be duplicitous: In a world of pain – a depraved Egyptian exile, imposing slavery and genocide on an innocent people – Moses transparently reflected the reality around him, and could therefore physically not speak clearly; his “speech was in exile” together with the people who were in Egyptian exile. With suffering all around him Moses’ mouth was literally locked.

    A more callous person, whose life does not necessarily reflect the pain of others – can continue speaking and pontificating even when he should be silent. As we unfortunately see all the time how we can easily go about smiling and celebrating while the city around us is burning. People are usually out to protect themselves and couldn’t care less about the suffering of others.

    But Moses, the faithful shepherd, could not rest when he witnessed others in pain. His physical body ached and his mouth quivered from all the suffering the Jewish people endured in Egypt.

    On a spiritual level, the mystics explain that the root Moses originated from is a dimension that is beyond expression. Moses’ soul was from the hidden world of “thought,” which cannot be expressed in the revealed world of “speech.” Moses therefore argued that he is not the person to redeem the people from the conscious world (speech).

    G-d, however, disagreed. “Who gave man a mouth … Is it not I, G-d? Now go, and I will be your mouth and direct what you say” (4:11-12). Precisely because Moses was the epitome of selflessness, because he felt the pain of others and was a soul that transcended expression (in words), therefore he was the one that G-d chose to redeem the people from their exile.

    And the power to do so came from the Divine “I will be your mouth,” which imbued Moses with the power to transcend his “stutter” and communicate effectively with Pharaoh and finally free the Jewish nation from the Egyptian exile.

    Ultimately, once they were redeemed from their misery in Egypt and they began integrating the Divine into their material lives, Moses too was healed and was able to express in words the deepest dimensions of the Divine.

    In other words, a man of selfless bittul always reflects the reality around him. In a world of suffering, in exile, a schism develops between his thoughts and words, and he falls silent. In a world of redemption he becomes channel between the supra-conscious world of thought and the conscious world of words.

    As we see that Moses becomes the greatest communicator in all of history. Following the exodus from Egypt, Moses receives the Torah at Sinai and proceeds to teach it to the people. This man of “no words” becomes the source of Divine words for all of time. An entire book of the Torah is even named “Devorim” – “these are the words that Moses spoke.” The words of Moses, the man of “no words,” are remembered forever. Is there anyone else in history whose every word is known and analyzed as those of Moses in the Bible? How many books and commentaries have been written to understand every utterance that came out of Moses’ mouth?

    How is it possible that the most powerful communicator is a man of “no words”? Because true communication is not about brilliant ideas, eloquent oratory skills, compelling presentations; it is about “bittul” (selflessness), about recognizing that you are a transparent conduit to convey a truth that is greater than yourself. Moses epitomized this bittul; he was more of an absorber of truth than a “speaker.” His transparency was therefore the key to his communicative skills. See The Art of Communication.

    Everything about Moses manifested “bittul” and sensitivity – as the chapter documents:

    “Moses was a shepherd” (3:1): The Midrash explains that G-d tests his leaders with sheep (as He later does with David). One sheep once wandered away from the entire flock. Moses sensed the missing sheep, and went searching, only to find the young animal sipping water from a nearby brook. Moses carried the sheep back to the flock. “Ahh,” G-d’ said. “If Moses is that sensitive to a single sheep amongst thousands, even when no one is watching, how much more so he will be sensitive to my people. He is worthy of being my chosen leader.

    Earlier Moses witnesses an “Egyptian kill one of his fellow Hebrews. He looked all around and saw no one, then he killed the Egyptian” (2:11-12). “He looked all around and saw no one” can be interpreted to mean that he saw no one cared – no one was concerned about the travesty being perpetrated against their fellow men. Moses however did care. So he proceeds to do what is necessary to protect innocent people from brutal genocide.

    The next day Moses sees “two Hebrew men fighting.” “Why are you beating your brother?” he asked them (2:13). Moses here too showed concern about the divisiveness among the Hebrews – though he received the classical response: “who made you our prince and judge,” another way of saying mind your own business.

    Ironically, in our information age, we have much to learn from Moses. With all our amazing advancements in communications technology, we have also an unprecedented level of miscommunication – between spouses, parents and children, neighbors, communities and nations. E-mail, forums, IM, blogs, VoIP has turned everyone into pundits – speaking and discussing about everything and nothing.

    But are we really speaking? Are we really communicating? Who is it that said “today people read more and more about less and less?”

    Moses may have been a man of “no words” but he teaches us that speaking – true speaking – is about communicating. And communicating is about listening as much as (if not more than) it is about speaking. The more transparent you are, the better your communication will be. Conversely, the more your ego is in the way, the less resonance your message will have. When your personality stands between your message and the listeners then your personality dilutes (and distorts) the message.

    Most of us have been blessed with the power of lucid speech. A great gift indeed. But do we use this gift to communicate truth? Are our words kind and loving and ones that elicit love? Are we able to convey in words our innermost feelings and deepest spiritual desires? Or are our words deceptive? How often do we lie? How often do we use offensive language – words that hurt, divide and conceal, rather than words that heal, unite and reveal?   Does our body’s speech speak the words of our soul? Or is it the other way around: Our soul’s energy is forced to speak the narcissistic words of materialistic pursuits? Physically we may speak clearly, but spiritually are we all not stuttering in one way or another?

    As long as there is no seamlessness between our spirits and our words we stutter along, once in a while hopefully sharing a true word or two?

    Stuttering is a reflection of a misalignment. In our distorted world, where spirit and matter have yet to fuse, where our material investments do not necessarily mirror our soul’s needs, we all stutter.

    We stutter in our search for love and intimacy, we stutter through our fears and insecurities, and we stutter when we are called upon to speak truth to our children and students. We stutter when we need to show kindness to friends and when we need to welcome and respect strangers.

    The only difference is that some of us have mastered the art of concealing our stutters beneath an elegant “façade” of words. Whether it is the “gift of gab” or excellent “sales skills,” “spin,” “buzz,” “hype” or “hooks” – we know how to convincingly “sell” something even if it has no true benefit (or we know how to convince ourselves that it has benefit even if it doesn’t). Not to suggest that every “sale” is worthless, but it’s a far cry from transparent selflessness.

    We live in a world of politicians, actors, models and performers – who pride themselves in their ability to project all sorts of images and standards with not the slightest stutter or blink.

    Stuttering reflects the dichotomy of existence, the split between the inner and the outer.

    But stuttering has another side to it. Every stutter is also a challenging opportunity to discover selflessness (bittul), and a brilliance that transcends mere words (as it was with Moses), as the stutterer in our opening story demonstrated with his profound empathy.

    This may also explain why stuttering affects four times as many males as females. Brain scans show that in women the connective tissue that allows communication between the two hemispheres of the brain tends to be thicker, perhaps facilitating interchange. In a study made by Simon Baron-Cohen, the director of the autism research center at Cambridge University and the author of “The Essential Difference: The Truth About the Male and Female Brain,” he tries to explain that the brain structure in women may be the reason why one study from Yale found that when performing language tasks, women are likely to activate both hemispheres, whereas males (on average) activate only the left hemisphere.

    He goes on to argue that psychological tests also reveal patterns of male/female differences. On average, males tend to score higher on mechanics tests than females do. Females, on the other hand, average higher scores than males on tests of emotion recognition, social sensitivity and language ability.

    Many of these differences are seen in adults, which might lead to the conclusion that all they reflect are differences in socialization and experience. But some differences are also seen extremely early in development, which may suggest that biology also plays a role. For example, on the first day of life, male and female newborns pay attention to different things. On average, at 24 hours old, more male infants will look at a mechanical mobile suspended above them, whereas more female infants will look at a human face. Girls tend to talk earlier than boys, and in the second year of life their vocabularies grow at a faster rate. One-year-old girls also make more eye contact than boys of their age.

    Cohen summarizes these differences by saying that “males on average have a stronger drive to systemize, and females to empathize.”

    Perhaps with their extra measure of empathy, women can counter some of the stuttering effects of a systemized universe out of touch with its soul.

    Moses on the other hand, because of his absolute empathy, actually absorbs and reflects the dichotomy of the universe, in order to help repair it.

    By introducing the soul into our lives and its profound empathy we can redeem the forces that lock our speech in “exile.” We can reveal the brilliance that often lies concealed within the “stutters” of our lives.

    There is something compelling about silence. Take silent films: With no sound to rely upon, actors have to communicate with facial expressions and body language. This is the first language that we all – as young children – are exposed to. Only later do we learn the language of words. Another way of putting it: Just as white space is more important than the actual letters of the printed word, the spaces and silence between words are more critical than the spoken sounds.

    “Just as it was in the days when they left Egypt [so too in the future] I will show you wonders.” Let us learn sensitivity from Moses how to heal a fractured world.

    The lessons are simple but profound:

    Never be complacent. Care about those around you. Take a stand against injustice. Protect the innocent. Fight those that are ready to hurt others. Show concern and act forcefully in face of terrorism. Stand up against any form of divisiveness.

    Above all: be humble and sensitive.

    Allow Moses into our lives and just as then, so today, we will experience wonders.

  • Are You Responsible for Other People’s Reactions?

    Are You Responsible for Other People’s Reactions?

    Are you responsible to repress your opinion if it may offend others? In a culture where trigger warnings, safe spaces, and social-media outrage have become part of the common parlance, it can be hard to discern what your responsibility for another person’s reaction is. Is there an absolute guideline?

    Self-expression is a divine right that we each have. At the same time, this right comes with great responsibility to be sensitive to others with different and even conflicting opinions. (It’s not just a free-for-all for you to express your ego.) How can we balance the two?

    The 4000-year-old tradition of Kabbalah offers a practical answer that encourages personal responsibility while supporting autonomy and free-speech. The following three guidelines for communication can help you to communicate sensitively while maintaining your right to express your truth.

    Guideline #1: Humility

    Humility is the key to balancing your right of self-expression and consideration of others. Your right to express yourself is not about you. It’s about a gift you were blessed with to illuminate a deeper insight into life and the human condition. When communicating truth, emotional and spiritual tools to help people live better lives, ego, arrogance and the likes, all block the way for healthy communication.

    If you are truly humble in your critique, you open up the listener to feel that you really have his or her welfare in mind. Whereas if you are arrogant, the other will close up and not be receptive to your opinion. You may even evoke a sense in others that you are just angry, obnoxious, and condescending, looking to show someone up and demonstrate your sense of superiority.

    Your responsibility is to be humble, not to be silent. To express yourself with gentleness and care, not to placate others and their feelings.

    And when you communicate that way, you engender and cultivate respect and dignity.

    Guideline #2: Mutual Respect

    It’s crucial to create an environment of mutual respect, even as you exercise your freedom of expression. There are ways to communicate, even if you disagree with someone entirely. What is offensive is not having another opinion, but the lack of respect for the sacred space of another human being, including their opinions.

    The sacred-space of another human being does not equal the common perception of “safe-space” — it’s far deeper. It means respecting the essence of another person — the fundamental internal goodness and dignity of a person. We are all responsible for our own emotional reactions — your responsibility as a speaker is to communicate respectfully and from the heart.

    Guideline #3: Don’t Intentionally Offend People

    You have a right to speak the truth, not a right to deliberately offend people. In the media culture of pundits, shock-jocks, critics, and social media provocateurs, it is unfortunately profitable to intentionally offend people. However, money is no barometer for success — adding light to dark places is. The best way to help inspire others to improve their ways is by showing love. Not as a gimmick or maneuver to warm that person up so that you can rebuke him, but simply, with genuine, sincere love – demonstrating that you really care.

    What really lays at the heart of the resistance anyone has to hearing rebuke? Pride, fear of being judged, shame, exposure. And conversely, what truly motivates one to try correcting a wrongful situation? Warmth, kindness, care, and concern. If your words of rebuke are condescending, rest assured that your words will not have an effect. If however the other person feels that your words are coming from a heartfelt place, that you sincerely care about him, then he may be open to hear what you have to say.

    Exercise: Make a concerted effort today to examine how you communicate with others. If you find yourself criticizing another, check yourself and change your tone and attitude. Take responsibility for your form of expression. Go out of your way to speak to one person today from your heart. Record your progress in your MyMLC journal.


    Go deeper into this subject: In Defense of Anarchy | To Intervene or Not to Intervene | Humility Is Not Self-hatred | The Art of Communication | Art, Religion and Democracy | Mixing G-d and Politics |


    SOULGYM I MASTERCLASS
    Live with Rabbi Simon Jacobson
    Who Cares? Responsibility in an Age of Indifference
    November 19, 2025 @8:30pm
    Live Stream | Podcast

    Add to Calendar

  • How to Express Your Opinion Without Being Arrogant

    How to Express Your Opinion Without Being Arrogant

    Are you aware of your communication skills? Do you know how others hear you? How often do you express an opinion, only to be misunderstood, or to be met with an angry or hurt reaction? Do you find that you often can’t get through to others? Do you offend people more than you think you should? Do people tell you that the way that you speak is arrogant or condescending? Though habits of speech are deeply ingrained, you can change them. The following three approaches can help you infuse the way you speak with sensitivity and humility — with practice, you can reach and influence others.

    Transcend Yourself

    When you have a strong opinion about a given manner, it’s easy to speak arrogantly. The smarter you are, the more powerful your resolve, the more convinced you are in the righteousness of your position, the greater the care that needs to be taken to communicate with sensitivity and not hurt others in the process. There are ways to communicate, even if you disagree with someone entirely, without offending. What is offensive is the lack of respect of the sacred space of another human being, including their opinions. Every person is entitled to their opinion.

    This may be the greatest secret to a healthy relationship or marriage: Your ability to transcend your own strong position and certainty. Look into your passionate heart and learn the art of restraint: That ultimate greatness is measured not by how right you are and by how great is your light, but by how you allowed that greatness to be contained and integrated into other people’s lives — wow well you listened to others and not just spoke to them.

    Humility = Effective Communication

    Self-actualization, self-expression is an integral part of the life mission that we each have. At the same time, there’s a responsibility in what that mission entails. It’s not just a free-for-all for you to express your voice and ego; self-expression should come with great humility knowing that you were blessed with the power to illuminate a deeper insight into life, into the human condition. When we speak, we create. We extend ourselves beyond the reality of our own existence to recreate ourselves and our vision of reality in the minds, hearts, and deeds of others.

    Humility is the key to true and effective communication. Whether one is an artist or a therapist, a spouse or a parent, humility is what allows your words and expressions to reach the heart of another. This is especially true when it comes to people in whom we entrust our confidence, like therapists, mentors and parents. Without humility the communicator can become manipulative and abusive. When vulnerability is exposed, it is absolutely crucial that the person we trust be humble and sensitive.

    That doesn’t mean that you must tolerate inappropriate behavior and can’t criticize. It means that the critique will be constructive and saturated with love and humility. And the person being criticized will feel that you really have their welfare in mind. Whereas if the critique is coming from an arrogant place, the communication will come across as angry and judgmental.

    Don’t Make It About You

    True speaking is listening. It is not about you (the speaker and teacher); it is about the truth, the knowledge, and about the people you are speaking to.

    Words from the heart enter the heart. Words that come only from the mouth or even the mind, enter one ear and out the other.

    True, there are speakers we listen to for their brilliance, for their advice on medical, financial, or other issues. Though they may be arrogant speakers, we still listen to what they have to say, because we want their information. In exchange for their “goods” we may be willing to tolerate their egos and even obnoxiousness (not for long, and sometimes not even for a moment). But even then, no true communication has taken place; only (at best) a transactional imparting of information.

    This may be true regarding cold facts and hard information. But when it comes to communicating truth, emotional and spiritual tools to help people live better lives, then ego, arrogance and the likes, all block the way for healthy communication.

    Exercise: Think of a time when the way you spoke received an unpleasant reaction. Look for arrogance in it. How would you use the concepts discussed in this Soul Workout to do it differently? Write about it in your MyMLC journal


    Go deeper into this subject: Crime of Passion | Art, Religion, and Democracy | Eliezer’s Story | The Art of Communication |


    SOULGYM I MASTERCLASS
    Live with Rabbi Simon Jacobson
    Is Arrogance Masking Ignorance and Insecurity?                      Wednesday, February 28, 2024 @8:30pm
    Live Stream | Podcast

    Add to Calendar

  • Stereotyping

    Stereotyping

    The Communication Revolution

    Why is it that in our age of state-of-the-art communications – smartphones and social media, e-mails and texting – we have hardly made any progress in personal communications? On an intrapersonal or interpersonal level, in families and communities, from cultures to nations, strife and discord dominate our lives and our world. With all our connections, we have never been so disconnected.

    An underlying theme in the Exodus narrative – related in these weekly Torah portions – is the power of speech. Moses, the “man of no words,” is chosen by G-d to be His communicator to Pharaoh, and then later the conveyor of Torah to the Jewish people. “And G-d spoke to Moses, speak to the people…” is a phrase used hundreds of times throughout the Torah. Indeed, an entire book of Torah (the fifth book) is called “Words” – “These are the words that Moses spoke” – the words of the “man of no words”…

    Pharaoh in Hebrew consists of the two words “peh rah,” evil mouth. By contrast, Passover, Pesach, is comprised of the two words “peh soch,” speaking mouth. Indeed, the Pesach Haggadah recreates the Exodus in the form of a relating a story. “Haggadah” means just that: Telling the story, from the verse “v’higadito l’vincho,” and you shall relate to your children. The Passover Seder is meant to serve as the ideal model of dialogue and communication.

    We thus bring you a relevant correspondence with Rabbi Jacobson about the nature of communication that opportunely took place this week.

    Dear Rabbi Jacobson,

    In your exceptional article (Your Life: The Ultimate Journey) I was taken by your use of a powerful analogy (of the roadmap and tools one acquires to survive on the dark lonely island), which intrigued me and pulled me further in, until I realized – too late for me to escape – that you were talking about God, Torah and mitzvoth.

    I was wondering about your style, which one encounters in many of your classes and writings. I am a marketing and communications consultant and am fascinated by the way you convey ideas, that on their own could appear alien to some of us, and yet you turn them into profound insights into the human condition and highly attractive and relevant sources of inspiration.

    Michael

    Dear Michael,

    Let me share with you an experience. When I first began teaching my weekly class, the core group attending consisted of people from the arts and entertainment industry. They were spiritual seekers, yet many of them did not identify with any religious affiliation. In fact, quite a few – reflecting a proportionate cross-section of society – were actually turned off by established institutions of faith.

    Recognizing this fact I felt a keen disadvantage trying to communicate to this group. I remember thinking: Here I am sitting with a bear and yarmulke – hardly projecting a neutral image. Before even before uttering a word some of the audience will inevitably be stereotyping me. Not with any malicious intentions, but simply based on their experience. I may be reminding some of an overbearing pious grandfather that may have shlepped him to synagogue against his own will. Or an irrelevant Hebrew school teacher that taught him hollow Bar-Mitzvah lessons. Or an angry and abusive religious authority, lashing out with guilt-ridden fire and brimstone. Or a religious fanatic, judgmental and condescending, mindlessly trying to impose dogma upon him and his friends.

    Given, I may also be evoking some fond memories of the “old home.” But I was intensely aware of not being in control of how they would react to my image.

    So, I tried an experiment. Instead of using any conventional words associated with religion or faith, in place of overtly Jewish and Hebrew words, I created a “new” vocabulary. Instead of the word G-d in my discussion, I used the expression “Higher Reality,” “the Essence.” For more new-age audiences – I added “non-existential states of undefined layers of energy.” I substituted “roadmap” (or “blueprint”) for the word Torah, “connections” for Mitzvot and “destination” for the Final Redemption.

    An interesting discussion ensued, with the heated participation of the entire group, about a journey toward the Essence of all existence, following a blueprint and connections, all reaching a destination. We all, everyone at the class, felt the common human denominator of how we all struggle in the material world to discover transcendence in our search to connect to something higher.

    After a few weeks of these classes, all masked in the language of kindred spirits, someone approached me and asked: “Are you talking about G-d”? I replied: “Yes. But shhh; don’t spoil it for the others.”

    The experiment worked beyond my expectations. By stripping the conversation of “loaded” words, words that carry different meanings for different people, religious references that are fraught with stereotypes and misconceptions, we were able to create a meaningful dialogue. By using non-threatening, neutral, expressions, ones that evoke our commonality instead of our differences, we – people of such different and even dichotomous backgrounds – were able to communicate and bond with one another. We were – and until this very day – all enriched in the process.

    Take the word “G-d.” Just my spelling is different than most people’s who use an “o” instead of a hyphen. Are there two people on this planet that can agree as to the definition of the word “G-d”? Try this test: Ask people you know to define G-d. Beyond the prerequisite, text-book, response – the Creator, the First Cause, a Supreme Being – no two people will define G-d the same way. For many, the concept of G-d is defined by nursery school images of a “man with a white long beard in heaven who strikes us with lightning when we misbehave.” This three-letter word is fraught with perhaps more stereotypes than any other word in the dictionary. Everyone has an opinion about G-d. Some are radical believers who die and kill others in the name of their so-called God. Others are agnostics or atheists, some radical who kill in the name of no God. No one is neutral about G-d. Because G-d has far-reaching implications, invoking personal responsibility, addressing the issues of good and evil, morality, government and education. Virtually every aspect of life is affected by our acceptance or rejection of G-d, and our definition of the word.

    No wonder Rabbi Levi Yitzchak of Berditchev said to his self-proclaimed atheist neighbor: “The G-d you don’t believe, I too don’t believe in.”

    We conventionally like to think of words as bridges, connecting different, and even conflicting, people. Misunderstandings, often deep ones, can creep in when we remain silent and do not speak with one another. Words, then, are the way to bridge different interests.

    In truth, however, words can also be forces that divide us. Use the wrong word and you can close down the person you are attempting to open up. Certain words may seem innocuous enough to us. But those same words can cause another to go ballistic.

    You see, words are loaded. In childhood we may have heard a certain expressions used in derogatory fashion. Your mother may have exclaimed a particular phrase – or snickered an insulting nickname of yours – every time she was displeased with you. Those phrases then become etched in your psyche, and whenever they are used you recoil.

    Words, which inherently begin as neutral and objective, take on subjective shape as they become associated with particular experiences – some pleasant and some unpleasant.

    The secret of communication, thus, is about sensitivity: not only to know what words to use, but also – and perhaps even more importantly – to know what words not to use. An excellent teacher will convey ideas that resonate and engender trust. And trust is not only saying the right things, but also avoiding saying the wrong things.

    Real communication is a relationship: A relationship between two people – not one dominant over the other, but a true partnership, with each one sensitive to the other, and exerting effort to ensure that the words used between them are not limited to the terms of the speaker but are measured on the terms of the listener. In effect, one can say that true speaking is listening: Applying yourself, paying attention and absorbing the needs of the one you want to reach, and then speaking in kind.

    In effect, one can say that true speaking is listening: Applying yourself, paying attention and absorbing the needs of the one you want to reach, and then speaking in kind.

    Moses, the communicator of G-d’s word in the Torah, was the ultimate communicator. As a man of G-d his utter humility allowed him to speak Divine words that resonated in all those that heard him speak. Moses, man of no words, had a relationship with G-d, in which they both listened and spoke to each other. This communication/relationship would take place primarily in “ohel moed,” which means the “meeting tent,” where G-d would and Moses would commune.

    The Torah is all about developing a relationship between man and the Divine. “Built Me a Temple and I will rest among you.” All the references to speaking in the Torah are teaching us the method how to communicate – how to listen and how to speak.

    Unfortunately, over the passing generations the Divine truths were “lost in translation.” Men imposed there own meanings, with their own words, on the inner truths of reality.

    Our challenge today is to revisit the original words in their pristine meaning, before they were hijacked. We must learn to free our language from the man-made word-filled traps that lock away true ideas. This effort requires a Moses-like humility and sensitivity, to be focused not on what YOU, the communicator, want to say and on your choice of words. The focus must be on the listener, and gently finding the right resonating words (while avoiding the stereotype-evoking ones) that will convey the essence of truth.

    Be careful with your language. Words can be flowers, but they also can be swords.

    Let us declare war against stereotyping; something we all do. Stereotyping is as natural as it is shallow. At every turn in our lives we are faced with the option: To stereotype or not to stereotype. Instead of lazily fitting someone into a pre-defined, and inaccurate, mold, let us look at another as we want them to look at us: As a unique individual, not a clone nor a caricature of our imagination or an image etched on history’s canvas.

    All the gadgets in the world cannot teach you sensitivity and, its direct product: true communication and a true relationship.

    When we learn this secret we will have ushered in the true communication revolution.

  • How to Improve Your Listening Skills

    How to Improve Your Listening Skills

    Are you a good listener? (That is a trick question; only others you speak with can tell you whether you are good listener.) In our current culture many of us have become far better speakers than listeners. Some listen in order to talk — listening as a way of understanding your “customer” in order to know how to respond and “pitch” your idea. That attitude blocks true and effective communication, which consists of a mutual, two-way conversation where both participants are equal, without one person dominating over the other.

    Whether you are at work, with your family, or among friends, here are four ways to improve your listening skills and relate to others better.

    Silence and Serenity

    Sit quietly and focus on the person you are listening to and what he or she is saying. Look at the person. Don’t allow yourself to get distracted. Don’t judge. Don’t react.

    Get Out of the Way

    Take yourself out of the picture. Avoid jumping to identify with or relate to what the other person is saying — don’t make their story about you. It’s not about you. It’s about them.

    Attune Your Perception and “Cup Your Ears”

    Open your ears and tune in to listen to the person speaking with you. Turn down the emotional noise of your other senses, and turn up the emotional volume of your hearing. “Cup your ears” and try to listen to the unspoken words as well; the “between the lines” feelings and sentiments being conveyed.

    Care, Empathize and Acknowledge What You Are Hearing

    It’s more than smiling and nodding — acknowledging what you are hearing requires care and compassion. Acknowledge the specific points the other person is making. Ask questions that lead to deeper clarity and conversation. Address the specific needs of the person to whom you are listening. Care.

    Exercise: Remember a time in your life when someone listened to you effectively. Examine what he or she did that made you feel heard and understood.  Record your answer in your MyMLC journal.


    Go deeper into this subject: Listen to the Flames | Bringing Light to the Darkest Places | Comfort My People | The Talking Donkey | How Not to Say the Wrong Thing | The Art of Communication | Why Are You Not Connecting? | Fireworks

    Join the Soul Gym to Unlock Your Trapped Potential
    Get free exercises to your inbox for self-mastery and growth.

  • How Not to Say the Wrong Thing

    Do you often find yourself saying the wrong thing? Or saying what might be a right thing, but saying it at the wrong time, or with the wrong tone of voice, or in a way that ends up being totally misconstrued? Do you find yourself thinking . . . “Arrghh! Why did I say that?” Or “I didn’t mean it like that!” Or “Why didn’t I just keep my mouth shut?” Or “Why didn’t I say something!”

    Ah, Words. Words are perhaps the most powerful tool in the world. Words are a great equalizer; this potent gadget of the mind is luckily available to virtually every human being with a functioning brain. So it should come as no surprise that our lives largely revolve around how to wield these slippery, mysterious mechanisms we call words most wisely . . . and most effectively.

    Speaking empathetically and compassionately goes beyond the rules of etiquette. Here are three things to do next time you want to communicate something important:

    • Listen before you speak. Listen to and seek to understand the person on the receiving end of your words: their situation, their wants, their thoughts, and their emotions. Listening to others is a vital component of empathy. Ask yourself, “Am I just waiting to talk, or am I truly listening?” Don’t judge; just listen. People don’t care that you know until they know that you care.

    • Be humble. Words are a channel for communicating a truth much bigger than yourself. Don’t let your words become hijacked for your personal gain. Keep them as transparent and ego-free as possible. Simply and clearly state the truth with kindness.

    • Be compassionate. Imagine yourself in that person’s Toms, or Nike sneakers, or Jimmy Choo pumps, and speak to them the way you’d want to be spoken to. Follow the Golden Rule, “Don’t do unto others what you would not want done unto you.”

    “Words: so innocent and powerless as they are, as standing in a dictionary, how potent for good and evil they become in the hands of one who knows how to combine them,” said Nathaniel Hawthorne. If we practice silence, humility, and compassion, our words will surely be potent for good. Remember, though, that you can’t control the reactions of others. It’s possible to say the right thing, but still elicit an angry reaction. But your responsibility is to assure that you have done everything in your power to express yourself clearly and compassionately. Words from the heart enter the heart. Even if the other person cannot absorb your words today, you have planted the seed for them to absorb it tomorrow or the next day.


    Go deeper into this subject: The Art of Communication | Why Are You Not Connecting? | Speaker of the House | The Stutterer


    This is an excerpt from: MyLife: Chassidus Applied Episode 45

    Join the Soul Gym to Unlock Your Trapped Potential
    Get free exercises to your inbox for self-mastery and growth.

    SOULGYM I MASTERCLASS
    Live with Rabbi Simon Jacobson
    What the Bible Teaches Us About the Power of Words
    Wednesday, June 28, 2023 @8:30pm
    Live Stream | Podcast

    Add to Calendar

  • Chukat: The Salute

    Chukat: The Salute

    Driving back from a family event, I was pondering on the words of one of the speakers about this week’s Torah portion, and wondering what I should be writing about in this column. I looked out the window and my good friend, Col. Jacob Z. Goldstein, Chief of Chaplains for New York State Army National Guard, saluted me.

    In the spirit of Divine Providence, the content of this week’s column suddenly emerged.

    The military salute is a motion that evolved from medieval times, when knights in armor raised their visors to reveal their identity.

    Interesting how seemingly trivial acts carry much meaning.

    There are some other aggressive symbols in modern culture.

    Why do people tip their wine glasses in a toast? In ancient times, as early as the 6th Century BCE, the Greeks – and later the Romans – were toasting to the health of their friend’s to assure them that the wine they were about to drink wasn’t poisoned. To spike the wine with poison, had become an all too common means of dealing with social problems — disposing of an enemy, silencing the competition, preventing a messy divorce, and the like. It thus became a symbol of friendship for the host to pour wine from a common pitcher, drink it before his guests, and satisfied that it was a good experience, raise his glass to his friends to do likewise. Others explain, that tipping the glass and allowing your wine to drop in your partner’s cup showed that your wine was not poisoned.

    Yet another example:

    In secular society, all men’s clothing button in the same manner: left over right. According to legend, this practice dates back to the days of knights in shining armor. Most knights were right-handed and so held their sword in their right hand and their shield in their left; their armor fastened left over right. Though men dropped armor in favor of modern and, thankfully, more comfortable clothing, the left-over-right tradition remained.

    Interestingly, Chassidim, by contrast, button their garments right over left, to show that chesed (love of the right side) dominates over gevurah (aggression on the left).

    Since we’re on the topic, I should mention another interesting contrast. At birthdays it has become customary for the birthday boy or girl to blow out candles on the birthday cake. The number of candles often corresponds to the age of the celebrant.

    Our editor once shared with us a story (here is the link, The Candle of G-d), how her two year old niece, instead of blowing out the candles, covered her eyes and blessed them, as she and her mother do every Friday before sunset when they light the Shabbat candles. The little girl remembered how her mother reminded her not to blow at the candles. The candle is symbolic of the human soul (“the candle of G-d is the soul of man”). Jews don’t blow out a soul; they ignite it.

    It’s quite fascinating how aggressive, military-style behavior still remains so much part of our modern lifestyles!

    Aggression seems to have has permeated so much of our lives, to the point that we don’t even recognize it.

    The Torah, on the other hand, always celebrates the dominance of spirit over matter, subtlety over aggression, gentleness over brutality. Torah heroes are not military leaders, but refined individuals – men and women of virtue, scholarship and wisdom. Jewish customs all demonstrate the dignified power of the human spirit, instead of the symbols of human aggression.

    Take this week’s Torah portion. Moses is commanded by G-d to speak to the rock so that it will give forth water. Instead, Moses strikes the rock. He is duly punished by not being allowed to enter the Promised Land.

    Among the many explanations of this strange story, is one (cited by the abovementioned speaker) that focuses on the power of words rather than force. “Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, says G-d” (Zacahriah 4:6). By striking the stone instead of speaking to it Moses defied this cardinal principle that true power lies in the spirit not in brute force.

    To be sure, Moses intended to sanctify G-d by demonstrating to the Jewish people G-d’s miracle of a stone producing water. So, after he attempted to speak to the rock to no avail, Moses felt that perhaps he had misunderstood G-d, and he needed to strike the rock, as G-d commanded him to do 40 years earlier. After all, water coming from a rock is a miracle either way, whether you speak to it or strike it!

    Had Moses challenged the very notion that a rock can deliver water, one could then argue that Moses defied G-d. But to strike the rock instead of speaking to it seems quite an act of faith.

    For any other person this “small” alteration would have been a mitzvah. However for Moses, the man of G-d, even a slight shift is a major event. G-d was attempting to teach a lesson that the ultimate method in life is to “speak” to the “rock,” spiritual power, rather than physical strength.

    Even if your child, student or yourself is hard like a rock, effective education is primarily through communication, not force. Words from the heart will enter the heart.

    Needless to say that at times force is necessary when confronting enemies, and often as a last resort. Hence, striking the rock the first time. Yet, the primary emphasis is always on communication, on chesed rather than gevurah.

    Life around us always offers us two options: Aggression or benevolence. Symbols of belligerence and hostility abound all around us. Even seemingly pleasant and non-confrontational situations – as we toast or salute each other, as we celebrate birthdays and button our jackets – are permeated with an aggressive undercurrent, a constant reminder of the harsh world in which we live.

    Yet we have a choice at all times: A choice to either succumb and become a shark as we swim with the sharks; to conform to the “survival of the fittest,” “dog eats dog” mentality, or to transcend the hostile world and live up to our Divine calling and the majestic spirit of our souls.

    Remember, if you’re not part of the solution you’re part of the problem.

    Please don’t see this as an attack on some of our contemporary customs. Rather it is an attempt to introduce a measure of sensitivity and conscientiousness into our lifestyles, and see how even small matters carry much significance. Above all, we must transform our customs into forces for good.

    So, let us tip our glass, light our flame, salute each other – with jackets buttoned right over left – in one grand toast of unity and love, declaring to the world: L’Chaim, to life.

  • Communication

    Communication

    Our sages have said:

    “Words that come from the heart, enter the heart.”

    Said the Lubavitcher Rebbe:

    “It therefore follows that if you seek to correct a failing of your fellow and are unsuccessful, the fault lies not with him, but with yourself. Had you truly been sincere, your words would certainly have had an effect.”

    Adapted from the teachings of the Rebbe by Yanki Tauber

  • Speaker of the House

    Speaker of the House

    The power of the word.

    What is it about the spoken word that can evoke such tremendous feeling? The way it is said? The one who says it? The implications it holds for the speaker and his listeners?

    What are spoken words? Nothing really, at least not in the material sense. If speech is creative, it is only in the sense that it impacts its listener. Physically, speech has no substance—all it is is a pattern of sound waves. Yet there is no mistaking the power of the word. The simple word has the power to move you, to inspire you, to utterly transform your perspective on reality.

    “Let there be light.” “Let the waters gather and land emerge.” “Let the earth sprout forth vegetation.”

    The Torah describes the creation of the world as a series of divine statements. If we wish to understand the nature of the created reality, the Torah is telling us, we must examine the phenomenon we call speech.

    As speech, G-d’s creating words did not actually create anything of substance. All they did was change a perception, change the manner in which a preexisting reality, the Preexisting Reality, would be perceived. When G-d said “Let there be light” nothing really happened—other than the impact this had on us, the listeners, to whom it made a world of difference.

    The Listener

    Say something. Any word or phrase. Say it again. And again. As you repeat your words they spin into meaningless noises. They have lost their impact. Spoken words that have no listener have no impact and, by definition, no existence. But say them again, this time to someone who hasn’t heard them yet, and they will regain their meaning and impact.

    If G-d speaks a world, then, by definition, someone is listening. Someone outside of Himself—“outside” in the sense that he perceives his own existence as something distinct of His, failing to comprehend that he is but the embodiment of the divine desire that he be. Someone who might consider G-d to be an idea, something to think about, or a force to be reckoned with. Or who might question His existence altogether.

    Someone who hears G-d’s speech of a world. Man.

    The Language

    You hear someone speak. He is saying something very powerful. Something with the ability to enlighten you, to provoke you, to open new vistas before you. You realize as much from the tone and timbre of his words. But you are unmoved. He is speaking Chinese.

    For the word to impact the listener, the listener must know the language.

    To appreciate the significance of the divine speech we call universe, we must first acquire the language in which it was spoken. “G-d looked into the Torah and created the world.” You can spend a fruitful lifetime just listening to the tone and timbre of the galaxies and quarks He articulated. But if you sense a significance to the grandeur of the stars, if you sense the whisperings of nature to be a communication, look to the Torah, the dictionary of creation. G-d gave us the Torah in order to teach us the language of creation, to enable us to comprehend His communication to us—and to communicate, in turn, with Him.

    The Conversation

    A conversation may sometimes serve no purpose other than to convey the information contained in its words. Directions to the bank, the price of the dress in the window. But this is speech at its shallowest. Meaningful speech is the endeavor to communicate, to reveal oneself to another.

    G-d spoke to us so that we may understand Him. Not just the world He said, but Him, its speaker. By mastering the language of Torah, we not only gain insight into the significance of the created existence—we also enter into a heart-to-heart conversation with its author and orator.

  • Technology: Vice or Virtue

    Technology: Vice or Virtue

    Everything G-d created in His world He created to express His glory 
    Mishne Avot 6:11

    In the early 1950’s, a couple and their young daughter had a private audience with the Rebbe. After the wife and husband had asked for advice on various issues, the Rebbe turned to the six-year-old girl and asked if she had any questions. Her parents tried to hush her up as she began to speak, so as not to take the Rebbe’s valuable time. But the Rebbe encouraged her to go ahead. The little girl, with a concerned look on her face, asked the Rebbe whether he thought that atomic energy was good or bad. “In your kitchen at home, there is a knife,” the Rebbe said. “Is the knife good or bad?” The little girl replied, “It depends what it is used for. If it is used to cut food, then it is good. If it is used to hurt someone, then it is bad.”
    “That is a good and true answer,” the Rebbe told her, “ and the same could be said for atomic energy or any other technology that man has developed.”

    During many of his discourses, broadcast around the world via cable and satellite relays, the Rebbe would encourage the use of modern communications to unite mankind. He explained how people across the globe, normally divided by space and time, are suddenly unified, creating an opportunity for them to study together, pray together, and resolve to do one more good deed, thereby forming a universal wave of togetherness. “One might think, ‘What can I possibly accomplish sitting in this tiny corner on this huge planet of billions of people?’” the Rebbe said. “Today, we see how one person lighting a candle in his tiny corner can illuminate the entire world.”

    Technology: Vice or virtue?

    The computer age and the information revolution have given all of us enormous power and the ability to reach virtually anyone at any time. Yes, technology allows us to live more comfortably and work more efficiently, but can we understand how it makes our lives more meaningful?

    On its own, science is neutral; it attempts to give us an objective view of our physical universe and its natural forces, but it does not draw a conclusion as to how we should use these forces. It does not deal with good and evil or with questions of morality. At its best, science acknowledges its own boundaries, recognizing that it is neither the basis nor the code for moral doctrine.

    Technology, as with all forces in our lives, can be used either constructively or destructively. Developments such as television, computers, and lasers, and discoveries in nuclear energy, medicine, and biology — these are all instances of G-dly forces that are manifested in nature. Man has been charged with tapping those resources to refine and civilize the world, to transform our material surroundings into a proper home for spirituality and G-dliness.

    We can choose to acknowledge the “hand inside the glove,” understanding where the power truly comes from, and use these forces as tools to lead a more meaningful life. Or we can choose to be distracted by the glove, to see technology only as a means unto itself, using it for indulgent, selfish, perhaps even destructive purposes.

     

    Why is it important to understand technology?

    The sweeping technological changes that have taken place during the past several generations are in keeping with the prediction some two thousand years ago in the Zohar, a classical text of mysticism, stating that in the year 1840, there would be an outburst of “lower wisdom,” or advancements in the physical universe, and an increase in “sublime wisdom,” or spirituality, would begin to usher true unity into the world, leading toward the final redemption.

    The increase in both types of wisdom — wisdom of the mind and wisdom of the soul — has surely come to pass; where we have fallen short is in integrating these spheres of knowledge. Only by balancing the scientific with the spiritual can we transform the dream of an ideal future into a functional blueprint for society, for true communication can begin only when human minds and souls interact. With communica­tion comes understanding; with understanding comes com­passion; and with compassion comes a natural movement toward universalism.

    So the current technological revolution is in fact the hand of G-d at work; it is meant to help us make G-d a reality in our lives. And as time goes on, science will show itself more and more to parallel the truths of G-d, thereby revealing the intrinsic unity in the entire universe.

    The divine purpose of the present information revolution, for instance, which gives an individual unprecedented power and opportunity, is to allow us to share knowledge — spiritual knowledge with each other, empowering and unifying individuals everywhere. We need to utilize today’s interactive technology not just for business or leisure but to interlink as people — to create a welcome environment for the interaction of our souls, our hearts, our visions.

    There is much to learn from the technological revolution, as long as we understand its role in our lives and see it as a final step in our dramatic search for unity throughout the universe. After all, developments in science and technology have taught us to be more sensitive to the intangible and the sublime: the forces behind computers, telephones, television, and so on are all invisible, and yet we fully recognize their power and reach. Similarly, we must come to accept that the driving force behind the entire universe is intangible and sublime, and we must come to experience the transcendent and G-dly in every single thing — beginning, of course with ourselves.

    With all our human capacity for technological advancement, we must never forget our higher objective. We must strive to enhance our scientific search for truth by constantly expanding our spiritual search for the divine.

    ACTION

    Understanding science and technology as divine tools for our personal and spiritual growth is critical for our well-being. It is well and good to learn to program a computer, but unless a student also acquires a sense of discipline and integrity, he or she might just as easily use that skill to wreak technological havoc as to obtain a job.

    The best students — and the best teachers — recognize that there is much to be learned by inspecting the failure of cultures before ours. By doing so, it becomes painfully clear that no amount of wisdom or technology can overcome a value system that encourages selfishness or evil. We must strive, therefore, to transcend humanity by constantly expanding our spiritual search.

    TML footer banner

    Buy the best-seller, Toward a Meaningful Life starting at $13.99, from our MLC ShopAmazon or Kindle. Or sign up for our weekly email to receive a dose of meaning every Thursday night.